Legal Opinion

Application of Thomas F. Doumani and Hal C. Huffman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 20, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6509PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection of claims 17 to 29, inclusive, of appellants’ application, No. 214,022, for a patent on a hydrocarbon conversion process and catalyst. Claims 18, 21, 24, and 29 are representative of the appealed claims and read:

“18. The catalyst of claim 21 wherein said carrier comprises co-precipitated silica-alumina gel containing between about 1% and 15% by weight of silica and between about 85 and 99% by weight of alumina.
“21. A hydrocarbon conversion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WestCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Robert K. Grasselli and Harley F. Hardman, and Rohm and Haas Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Application of Fritz Hostettler and Eugene F. CoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. In re SlocombeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  4. Application of Thomas F. Doumani and Hal C. HuffmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API