Legal Opinion

Penny v. City of Texarkana

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1966No. 7702PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

This is a common law negligence action. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded.

In the district court, after the plaintiff Birdie Mae Penny tendered evidence in support of her suit to recover damages for personal injury, the defendant, City of Texarkana, Texas, moved the trial judge to direct the jury to return a verdict for the city. The motion was granted and thereafter judgment was entered that Birdie Mae Penny take nothing.

The City of Texarkana, as appellee, urges affirmance of the trial court’s judgment on two basic propositions, first,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Waco v. LandinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Jones v. City of Fort WorthTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. City of Abilene v. FillmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. McLendon v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. SelterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Bowling v. City of Port ArthurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Cook v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. Osteen v. CrumptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Croft v. GULF & WESTERN INDUSTRIES, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API