Legal Opinion

Jones v. City of Fort Worth

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1924No. 455-3968PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Plaintiff in error sued the city of Port Worth for damages for personal injuries sustained by her by reason of her stepping into a hole or crack In the sidewalk. The ease was tried before a jury on special issues. Judgment' for $2,150 was rendered in her favor. The city appealed. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered’ judgment for the city. 249 S. W. 296.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is grounded upon its holding that Mrs. Jones failed to comply with the condition prescribed by the charter of the city of Port Worth precedent to its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McIntee v. City of MiddletownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Dorsey v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Peterson v. Village of CokatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. City of Fort Worth v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hallman v. City of PampaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. City of Beaumont v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Heck v. City of KnoxvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. OAK GROVE UNION SCH. DIST. OF SONOMA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Brewster v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API