Kennemer v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. “The decedent • being at the time of the homicide an adult-possessed of normal mental and physical faculties, though he was prevented by noises in the vicinity from hearing the train which approached him from the rear, could and should have exercised the faculty of sight, by which he would have ascertained upon merely turning his head that the train was approaching. He knew that he was in a place of danger when walking longitudinally along the track, and knew that there were noises thefé which interfered with his hearing, and consequently the slightest degree of care upon his part would…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. TapleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Southern Railway Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FulfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Davis v. Muscogee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Shepherd v. Southern Pine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Moore v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Richardson v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StampsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Vaughn v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.