Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 23, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the. Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

As stated in Gray v. Commonwealth, 293 Ky. 833, S. W. (2d) • — , the appellant, Archie Simpson, and William Gray, following an afternoon of drinking, waited or pursued Byrd Taulbee for the purpose of robbing him. Earlier that day Simpson had stolen a box containing about one hundred pennies from Taulbee ’s store while he and Gray were in there together. Under an overhead railroad, Simpson grabbed Taulbee, and, while he was wrestling with him on the ground, Gray struck him with a paving brick and fractured his skull. He died that night.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Tincher v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. English v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Gray v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Commonwealth v. GabbardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tarrence v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  2. Kruse v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  4. White v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. Gray v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API