Legal Opinion

Med-A-Dent Co. v. L. D. Caulk Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 24, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

The defendant, the L. D. Caulk Company, in October, 1923, circulated a paper ‘or pamphlet called Milford News, containing an article entitled “More Misbranding,” which the plaintiff, Med-A-Dent Company, by its declaration filed in this case, alleges to have been libelous, in that thereby the defendant “meant to charge the said plaintiff, by manufacturing its said product, called. Med-A-Dent, * * * with having committed the offense and being guilty of the crime of violating the provisions” of the Pood and Drugs Act of June 30, 1906 (34 Stat. 768), as amended. by Act of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Donahoe v. Star Publishing Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1902
  2. Ray v. ShemwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  2. Sweeney v. Buffalo Courier Express, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1940
  3. Christopher Scott Dangim v. CCDC, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025
  4. Jamar Jackson v. Reno Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
  5. McLaughlin v. DzurendaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API