Legal Opinion

Barr v. Randall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Ei'ror from Marshall District Court. Ejectment, brought by Barr against Randall and wife. Trial at the August Term, 1884, and judgment for defendants. The plaintiff brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action in the nature of ejectment, brought by S. M. Barr against William Randall and Elizabeth Randall his wife, to recover certain real estate situated in Marshall county. The action was tried before the court without a jury, and the court, after making certain findings of fact and conclusions of law, rendered judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff for costs. The plaintiff brings the case to this court for review.

It appears that one James C. Smith held the original patent title to the land in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marsh v. WhitmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Judd v. DriverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
  3. Case v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Greenwood v. SpringNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Ellis v. PeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Manley v. MayerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Doudna v. HarlanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Wolfe v. BrookeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API