Legal Opinion

American National Insurance v. JPMmorgan Chase & Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2009-1743PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Bondholders of Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu” or the “Bank”) sue JP Morgan Chase Bank and JP Morgan Chase Co. (together “JPMC”) for allegedly spreading misinformation about WaMu that caused credit raters and federal regulators to doubt the Bank’s ability to weather the financial storm of 2008. As a result of these alleged nefarious activities, JPMC was able to acquire WaMu at a fire-sale price and the bonds were rendered worthless. Plaintiffs sue JPMC for tortious interference with their bond com tracts, unjust enrichment, and breach of a…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Terry v. First Merit National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. American National Insurance v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. America West Bank Members v. State of Utah, TheDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
  4. FDIC as Receiver for Signature Bridge Bank v. ConcordiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  5. Hrh Services LLC. v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API