Legal Opinion

Noble Crigler v. Cessna Aircraft Company and Avco Corporation, Avco-Lycoming Division

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 19, 1987No. 86-8796PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant Noble Crigler brought suit in federal court alleging that defendants-appellants Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) and Avco Corporation, Avco-Lycoming Division (Avco), conspired to defraud Crigler by selling him an airplane that had a defective engine while assuring Crigler that the engine was not defective. The district court granted summary judgment to both defendants, concluding that a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airworthiness directive (AD) put Crigler on legal notice of the engine problem and that Crigler therefore could not prove he justifiably relied on any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. John Rauch v. United Instruments, Inc. And Tokyo Aircraft Instrument CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Joseph T. Labelle, George Blanchard v. McCauley Industrial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. Gates Learjet Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
  2. Lucia v. Teledyne Continental MotorsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API