Legal Opinion

Lucas v. CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS CO.

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided November 15, 2005No. CIV. 03-00295 HG-LEKPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GILLMOR, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff alleges that Defendants’ practice of imposing maximum price restrictions in its rebate program for the installation of solar water heaters on the island of Kauai violates state and federal antitrust law. Plaintiff also alleges a cause of action for defamation. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all claims.

For the reasons set forth below, Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on the federal and state antitrust claims and the defamation claim. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

P…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tuomela v. Waldorf=Astoria Management LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API