Hartman v. Young
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Umatilla County.
1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.
This was a proceeding under the provisions of title 4', chapter 14, sections 2544-2548, Oregon code, to contest the right of the defendant to the office of county clerk of Umatilla County, to which he was declared elected by the board of canvassers of said county.
In substance, the facts alleged impeach the correctness of the returns as certified, in the wrongful and erroneous counting of the votes of South Pendleton precinct, etc., whereby the defendant was declared duly elected, etc.
The answer, after making the usual denials, alleged affirmatively and separately that the poll-book of said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMillan v. Mich. S. & N. I. R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Reynolds v. State, ex rel. TitusIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Hudson v. SolomonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- People Ex Rel. Dailey v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- O'Gorman v. RichterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Edwards v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Davenport v. OlerichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Dent v. Board of CommissionersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
- Witham v. McNuttOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Moon v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.