Wolford v. Freeman
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
In this action plaintiffs seek to rescind an executed contract for the purchase of a house and lot because of fraud, and to recover the purchase price. The trial court decreed rescission and entered judgment for the purchase price paid, less the rental value while held by plaintiffs. Defendants appeal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiffs are husband and wife. Reference herein *539to the plaintiff will be to Roy E. Wolford, the husband. Plaintiff is a real-estate agent and had engaged in buying and selling property on his own account. The defendants are husband and wife.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Distributors Investment Co. v. PattonTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Clauser v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ashby v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Weintraub v. KrobatschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Gibb v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.