Legal Opinion · Dissent

Petras v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1993No. 93 C.D. 1993Published

1DissentFriedman, Judge

I believe that United States Steel Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 62 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 502, 437 A.2d 92 (1981) controls here. Moreover, I believe that under U.S. Steel, where, as here, a referee found that Claimant sustained a work-related hearing loss and granted Claimant’s petition seeking medical expenses in the form of payment for a hearing aid, that award is properly the basis for a suspension order even where Claimant was never paid compensation benefits. Thus, I respectfully dissent.

The majority, in concluding its opinion, states:

[TJhere was never a finding that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Montgomery v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Corden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API