Legal Opinion

Kosiorek v. University of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term correctly denied petitioner’s application for nunc pro tunc approval of an out-of-court settlement. The statute (Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 [5]) authorizes a Justice of the court in which a third-party action "was pending” to approve a compromise order. Petitioner’s claim that approval can be obtained even though no third-party action has been commenced (see, Scott v Orange County Dept, of Health, 89 Mise 2d 853) is contrary to the plain language of the statute, and is not supported by the expressed legislative intent of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dauenhauer v. Continental Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Gregory v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. DeRosa v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Joslyn v. State Insurance FundNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Beck v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API