Legal Opinion
Tonkin Construction Co. v. County of Humboldt
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 1987No. A031452PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
Respondent Tonkin Construction Company (Tonkin) filed a “complaint for money due” against appellant County of Humboldt (County) for failure to perform certain representations and agreements implied in the parties’ written contract. Following court trial, Tonkin was awarded $27,276.08 in damages against the County. The County appeals, arguing that the record does not support a finding of its liability to Tonkin. We affirm the judgment.
I
In September 1983, the County and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) undertook to restore the shoreline in a portion of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- EH Morrill Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Wunderlich v. State of California Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frankel v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Sandia Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1988
- Morris, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Amelco Electric v. City of Thousand OaksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.