Dania, Inc. v. Skanska USA Building Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — Dania, Inc. appeals the trial court’s summary dismissal of its construction defect action against Skanska USA Building, Inc. Dania argues that the trial court erred in concluding that the statute of repose, RCW 4.16.310, barred its action. Because there is a question of fact as to whether Dania filed its complaint before the applicable limitations period expired, we hold that the trial court erred in ruling as a matter of law that the statute of repose barred Dania’s complaint. Accordingly, we reverse the summary judgment order dismissing Dania’s complaint against Skanska and remand for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Northwest Independent Forest Manufacturers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Schaaf v. HighfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carr v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Cacchiotti Properties, LLC v. Bradley Phillips, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. Pilchuck Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Tillman Carr v. Wa State Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015