Legal Opinion
Bystricky v. Bystricky
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Anthony L. Parga, J.
It is ordered that the motion by the defendant wife for an order awarding her (1) expert fees in the sum of $2,500 for the purpose of evaluating plaintiff husband’s alleged enhanced earning capacity, and (2) interim counsel fees in the sum of *915$10,000 is denied in its entirety (see, West v West, 213 AD2d 1025; Kyle v Kyle, 156 AD2d 508).
The partjes were married on December 1, 1973. The defendant contends that the future earning potential of the plaintiff, a police officer with the Rockville Centre Police Department since 1974, “was directly enhanced by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Semans v. SemansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Elkus v. ElkusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moll v. MollNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- Sutka v. SutkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001