Legal Opinion

Berry v. Dalman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1953No. Docket 10, Calendar 45,446PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Plaintiff sold a carload of lumber to the defendants. One-half the purchase price was paid and this action was brought to recover the balance, the defendants having refused payment claiming that under the terms of an oral agreement made subsequent to delivery they owed nothing. Plaintiff recovered judgment for the remaining amount of the original purchase order and defendants appeal claiming error in the exclusion of certain evidence.

Most of the facts are not in dispute. On November 22, 1949, plaintiff offered to sell and defendants agreed to purchase a carload of lumber of specific size,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowers v. PixleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Sandbo v. SandboSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lynes v. J. R. Heineman & Sons, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Villa v. GolichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API