Legal Opinion

Lynes v. J. R. Heineman & Sons, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1961No. Docket 15, Calendar 48,416PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The controversy here concerns the terms of a contract. The plaintiff, who was engaged in construction work, was a subcontractor on the school job we are to consider. The defendant, also engaged in the construction business, was the principal contractor for the job. The positions of the parties may be very simply stated. The plaintiff claims he agreed to do certain work for $8,485. The defendant, on the other hand, asserts that the agreed figure was only $5,100. In a suit for the difference between the 2 figures, plaintiff had judgment, and defendant is before us on a general appeal. It is the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Houghton v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Berry v. DalmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Merrill v. ShumwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bill v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Siller v. LaitilaMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Port Huron Township Park Commission v. BluskaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Arrett v. JanksMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API