Legal Opinion

Van Hoesen v. Gelfen

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 1, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In December, 1921, the complainant, a man then about seventy-five years old, and in somewhat feeble health, arranged a sale of a dwelling house property in Plainfield, through the defendant Gelfen, with whom he had had numerous dealings and upon whom he had come to rely. The sale was for $10,000 — $500 cash and $9,500 purchase-money bond and mortgage — to the defendants Samuel Schwartz and Bessie, his wife. Complainant executed the deed and gave it to Gelfen for delivery; Gelfen gave complainant the $500 and showed him what he said were the bond and mortgage, and told complainant he would…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. LittleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
  2. Irving v. Mutual Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  3. Monroe v. De ForestNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1895
  4. O'Mara v. NugentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mann v. BugbeeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Crane Co. v. James McHugh Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. NJ BK. & TR.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Burack v. MayersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  5. Kelly v. Middlesex, C., Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API