Legal Opinion

Anello v. Schmid CA1/1

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 2021No. A160440Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 6/11/21 Anello v. Schmid CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE LORI ANELLO, Plaintiff and Respondent, A160440, A160540 v. FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID, (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCV-266198) Defendant…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. S.M.California Supreme Court · 2004
  4. City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Ochoa v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API