Legal Opinion

Anthony Mills v. Arlene Bluth

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided February 25, 2026No. 6:26-cv-00760Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Anthony Mills, ) C/A No. 6:26-cv-00760-TMC-WSB ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ) Arlene Bluth, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil action against the above-named Defendant. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff filed this action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B) (D.S.C.), the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge is authorized to review the Complaint for relief and submit findings and recommendations to…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API