Anthony Mills v. Arlene Bluth
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Anthony Mills, ) C/A No. 6:26-cv-00760-TMC-WSB ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ) Arlene Bluth, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil action against the above-named Defendant. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff filed this action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B) (D.S.C.), the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge is authorized to review the Complaint for relief and submit findings and recommendations to…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.