Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Knauss

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On appeal from the First District Court of Jersey City.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Voorhees, J.

This is an action of replevin for diamonds, judgment being rendered for the plaintiff, who was the assignee of one Mabel Austin, whose title to the diamonds was admitted. It appeared that Austin had loaned them to Brown, the defendant’s intestate, in his lifetime, with permission to wear them until she should ask for their return. She did not request their return durixxg Brown’s lifetime. Upon Brown’s death, the diamonds were found among his effects, were taken possession of by the defendant, as his administrator, who afterwards inventoried…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Valengin's Administrators v. DuffySupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Jones v. SewardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  3. Harrison v. FleischmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ballew v. CaseMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Minnesota Odd Fellows Home v. PogueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Kirchner v. MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API