Legal Opinion

Colquitt & Baggs v. Stultz

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1880PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Pawn. Collateral security. Contracts. Damages. Negligence. Before Judge WRIGHT. Mitchell Superior Court. Maixh Term, 188O. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

JÁCKSON, Chief Justice.

To an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error, besides the general issue, the following pleas were filed : “ And for further plea in this behalf, this defendant says that when defendants gave said plaintiff the promissory note now sued on, they also gave him, as collateral security for said note, a certificate of thirty shares of stock in-- bank, a banking corporation located at Fort Valley, in said state, of one hundred dollars each, amounting in the aggregate to three thousand dollars, that when said note became due, and for some time…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Fisher v. George S. Jones Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Napier v. Central Georgia BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  4. First National Bank v. HattawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Mauck v. Atlanta Trust & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API