Legal Opinion

Mauck v. Atlanta Trust & Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 26, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Reid. City court of Atlanta. May-24, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

The Atlanta Trust and Banking Company brought suit against M. M. Mauck Company, M. M. Mauck, and F. 0. Mays, On a promissory note payable to the order of the plaintiff, signed by the M. M. Mauck Company, and indorsed by M. M. Mauck and F. O. Mays. So far as appears from the record, the Mauck Company and Mays filed no defense. Mauck filed a plea, in which he set up that lie was an accommodation indorser or surety on the note; that the maker of the same placed in the hands of the plaintiff certain accounts as collateral security; that from these accounts a sufficient amount had been collected…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. George S. Jones Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Colquitt & Baggs v. StultzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  3. Kiser v. RuddickIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Lee v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  5. Murphy v. BartschIdaho Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Citizens Bank v. ShawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Hurt v. CITIZENS TRUST COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Armstrong v. Citizens & Southern BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Gartrell v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API