Legal Opinion
Moore v. District 50 of United Mine Workers of America
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
Decided September 20, 1954No. 190,228PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By BARTLETT, J.
1. DEMURRER OF INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS TO AMEND PETITION SUSTAINED.
2. MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS FOR DISTRICT 50, UNITED MINE WORKERS, SUSTAINED.
L Demurrer of Defendants Nicholas A. Neagos, Charles A. Minozzi and Walter Orzoleck to the amended petition is upon the ground that this action was not brought within the time limited for the commencement of such action. While the petition alleges a conspiracy, the gist of the complaint or the essential ground thereof, is the assault and battery committed November 18, 1951. The averments as to the conspiracy are matters of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Sweetman v. BarrowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Priest, Rec. v. Amos, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
- Merrick v. MerrickMuskingum County Court of Common Pleas · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marshall v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Marshall v. OrtegaOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Marshall v. OrtegaOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Wallick v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1962