Legal Opinion

Bidinian v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 3, 1969No. Docket No. 164-69 SCUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Toros and Rose J. Bidinian v. Commissioner.

Bidinian v. Commissioner

Docket No. 164-69 SC.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1969-144; 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 153; 28 T.C.M. (CCH) 747; T.C.M. (RIA) 69144;

July 3, 1969. Filed

Toros Bidinian, pro se, 3600 Miami St., Sacramento, Calif. Nicholas G. Stucky, for the respondent.

DAWSON

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

DAWSON, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $149.75 in the Federal income tax of petitioners for the year 1966. The only issue for decision is whether petitioners are entitled to a dependency exemption deduction for Rose J.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De La Garza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  2. Estella De La Garza v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Carter v. CapshawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Helm v. GoinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API