Legal Opinion

Cory v. Morrison

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1982No. Civ. No. 25720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAMURA, J.*

The sole issue on this appeal is whether Revenue and Taxation Code section 13880 offends the equal protection clauses of the federal and state Constitutions because it exempts from state inheritance tax benefits accruing under “any public retirement system” without at the same time extending a like exemption to benefits payable under a private pension plan.1

James Earl Morrison worked for Rockwell International and upon his death, his surviving spouse was entitled to a pension of $900 per mdnth, the actuarial value which was calculated to be $125,965. The inheritance tax…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Phillipson v. Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Capitol Records, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Shafer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Estate of MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API