Legal Opinion

In Re Jackson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1992No. 67,549PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a contested attorney disciplinary proceeding involving Mary Catherine Jackson, an attorney licensed to practice law in Kansas.

The hearing panel found respondent violated Supreme Court Rule 207 (1992 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 160) by failing to cooperate with the investigation of four disciplinary complaints against her and that the failure to cooperate violated MRPC 8.4(g) (1992 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 328) (engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law) and may have violated MRPC 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice). The panel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CaenenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. State v. SavaianoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. In Re JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. In re HiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Abbott v. Kansas Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. Abbott v. Kansas Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. In re JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API