Legal Opinion

In Re Jackson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 12, 1991No. 65,747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,:

Mary Catherine Jackson, respondent, contests the findings and recommendations of a disciplinary hearing panel that she be suspended from the practice of law for two years for violating Disciplinary Rule 6-101(A)(3) (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 188); Model Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC) 1.3 (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 219), 1.4(a) and (b) (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 220), and 8.4(c) and (g) (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 290); and Supreme Court Rule 207 (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 141), by neglecting a legal matter, failing to keep a client informed, misrepresenting the status of a case to a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re MatneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re WilkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. In Re RumseySupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. In Re JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. In Re JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. In re JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API