Legal Opinion
Howe v. Haterius
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 27, 1933No. 9701PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEWEY, District Judge.
The assignment of error relates only to an order dismissing an amendment to the answer.
The appellee as plaintiff commenced a suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, the petition being filed on the 3d day of May, 1929, and alleges that the defendant, appellant here, and other stockholders of the Manhat*836tan Oil Company, entered into a written- contract with him by the terms of which they agreed to pay plaintiff and one C. F. Alexander 10 cents per share as commission for the exchange of shares of stock of the defendant and others in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chirac v. ReinickerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- United States v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Board of Drainage Com'rs of Pender County Drainage Dist. No. 4 v. Lafayette Southside Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Lange v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Henderson v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berthold-Jennings Lumber Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Oliefabrik v. A. O. Smith Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1958
- Sweeney v. Greenwood Index-Journal Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1941
- Harvey Estes Const. Co. v. DRY DOCK SAVINGS BANK OF NYDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.