Legal Opinion

Security State Bank v. Wernick

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement.

Bronson, Ch. J.

This is an equitable action to enforce a chattel mortgage. Plaintiff 'has appealed from a judgment of dismissal and has demanded a trial de novo. The facts are: — For several years defendant Cora Wernick farmed a section of land in Grant county. Theretofore her husband, prior to his death, farmed this land. For several years defendant Stanley Wernick worked as an employee of defendant Cora Wernick, and for her husband prior to bis death in 1916. in farming this land. Plaintiff is a hanking corporation. In 1919 Mrs. Wernick was indebted to plaintiff bank upon two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merchants National Bank v. CollardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Drivdahl v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Haugen v. SkjervheimNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Canfield v. OrangeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andersen v. ReslerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Eliason v. Production Credit Association of AitkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. City of Williston v. LudoweseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Depositors Holding Co. v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Williston v. LudoweseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API