Legal Opinion
Hardin v. DuPONT SCANDINAVIA (ARA-JET)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 9, 1990No. 89 Civ. 2128 (RPP)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff, a resident of Chester Heights, Pennsylvania, proceeding without the assistance of legal counsel, attempts by her complaint herein to navigate the difficult waters of the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Amendments Act of 1986 (“FCA”). 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. Plaintiff seeks indeterminate damages on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and over $20,000,000 for herself under § 3730 of the FCA.
Plaintiff filed her pro se complaint on March 20, 1989 on behalf of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue against six companies and five…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Michael Lissack v. Sakura Global Capital Markets, Inc. And Mitsui Taiyo Kobe Global Capital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- X Corp. v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
- Neal v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Mruz v. Caring, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Shapiro v. SutherlandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.