Legal Opinion
Baird v. Kessler
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 7, 2001No. CIV.S-00-1619WBS/PANPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHUBB, District Judge.
Plaintiffs and consenters (collectively “plaintiffs”) sue defendants Stephen Kessler, et al. for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. section 201 et seq. 1 Plaintiffs and defendants each move for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
I. Factual and Procedural Background 2
A.The Parties
Plaintiffs in this case were all employed during the relevant time period as correctional officers in the Transportation Unit of the California Department of Corrections (“CDC”), transporting inmates and parolees between…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Guifu Li v. A Perfect Day Franchise, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Johnson v. Serenity Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Arencibia v. 2401 Restaurant CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Maddock v. KB Homes, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.