Legal Opinion

Jones v. Motor Vehicles Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 1988No. 16-86-07627; CA A43461PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The state appeals from a circuit court decision reversing Motor Vehicle Division’s (MVD) suspension of petitioner’s driver’s license for “refusing” to submit to a breath test. ORS 813.100(3). The circuit court ruled that there was not substantial evidence that petitioner refused the test, because OAR 257-30-020(1)(c)(F) is ambiguous regarding what constitutes completing the breath test — i.e., whether a printout is required. The only issue is whether petitioner’s failure to continue to blow into the Intoxilyzer until a printed result was obtained constitutes a “refusal” under ORS 813.100(3).

Pe…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Borbon v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Call v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  3. Cobine v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. GalliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API