Legal Opinion

Borbon v. Motor Vehicle Administration

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1997No. 34 Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This is an action for judicial review of the suspension by the Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) under the implied consent law of the petitioner’s motor vehicle operator’s license. The issue is whether a result of “insufficient breath” reported by a breath alcohol testing device suffices, in and of itself, to prove that the motorist refused a breath test.

Maryland Code (1977, 1992 Repl.Vol., 1996 Cum.Supp.), § 16-205.1 of the Transportation Article (TR) provides for suspensions of motor vehicle operators’ licenses for refusals to submit to chemical tests for intoxication. TR §…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. OrthIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rawls v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  3. Strasburger v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. KilrainCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Joffre v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Administration v. LytleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Janes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Motor Vehicle Administration v. DelawterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Motor Vehicle Administration v. AtterbearyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Motor Vehicle Administration v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API