Vigil v. Leavitt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND GRANTING IN PART RESPONDENTS’ MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OR FOR REHEARING BY THE PANEL AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion, filed May 10, 2004, slip opinion 595, and appearing at 366 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir.2004), is amended as follows:
1. At slip op. 5967, first full paragraph, line 25; 366 F.3d at 1033, second full paragraph, line 39, delete “and applied here in the approval of Arizona’s SIP.”
2. At slip op. 5967, first full paragraph, line 26; 366 F.3d at 1033, second full paragraph, line 41, insert the following: “We need not resolve the question whether the EPA’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Arizona State Board for Charter Schools v. U.S. Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Sierra Club v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Vigil v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Allen v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Public AssistanceAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.