Legal Opinion

SFP Works, LLC v. Buffalo Armory LLC

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 31, 2016No. Case No. 14-13575Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Gerald E. Rosen, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

In this patent infringement suit, Plaintiff SFP Works, LLC alleges that Defendant Buffalo Armory LLC has infringed a patent held by Plaintiff, U.S. Patent No. 8,480,824 (the “’824 Patent”), by continuing to use Plaintiffs patented steel treatment technology after the expiration of a license granting Defendant the right to use this process. Defendant, in turn, has filed counterclaims against Plaintiff, seeking declarations that it has not infringed the ’824 Patent and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API