Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Briant

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 21, 1886PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is a complaint for unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors to a minor. The court assumed that the case was governed by Commonwealth v. Wachendorf, 141 Mass. 270; and instructed the jury that a sale by the defendant’s bar-tender might be explained by showing that it was not authorized by the master, or was done in violation of his orders and against his will.

On the question of authority, the defendant asked for a ruling, that “ agency for any other purpose will not warrant a *464presumption or inference of agency illegally to sell liquor.” The court refused the ruling; and instructed the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Byington v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Roberge v. BurnhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Commonwealth v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. George v. GobeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  5. Commonwealth v. WachendorfMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. BishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Doyle v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Commonwealth v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Ciarmataro v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API