Legal Opinion

STROUDWATER ASSOCIATES v. KIRSCH

District Court, D. Maine

Decided December 7, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00086Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE STROUDWATER ASSOCIATES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket No. 2:21-cv-00086-NT ) ROBERT KIRSCH, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON COUNTER-CLAIMANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND AND COUNTER-DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Before me are two related motions: a motion by the Counter-Claimants to amend their counterclaims (“Counter-Claimants’ Mot. to Amend”), and a motion by the Counter-Defendants to dismiss the counterclaims. For the reasons stated below, the motion to amend is GRANTED, and the motion to dismiss is DENIED. BACKGROUND1 I. The Agreements Around April…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API