Legal Opinion

Rae v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 7, 1962No. 586-57PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge

Plaintiff, a Reserve officer, while on a 15-day active duty tour, suffered a myocardial infarction, anteroseptal, due to arteriosclerotic coronary thrombosis, following an inoculation for influenza. His claim is that he is entitled to physical disability retirement on the ground that he sustained an “injury” while on active duty, under section 402 of the Career Compensation Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 802, 816.

Section 402 of the Career Compensation Act of 1949, supra, provides in pertinent part:

Sec. 402. (a) Upon a determination by the Secretary concerned (1) that a member of a Regular component of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gwin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Stephens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Francis G. Brown v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Candelaria v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Yount v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API