Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Department of Social Services Ex Rel. Wolf v. McCarty

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1993No. 17897Published

1ConcurrenceSabers, Justice

I concur on Issue I because the trial court erred in refusing to allow evidence of McCarty’s sterility. Therefore, I see no need to discuss the Frye test or DNA testing. See Daubert, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (discarding the Frye test which was superseded by the adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence).* I would not reach Issue II on attorney fees.

No purpose is served in having a trial on paternity if the defendant can not show evidence of sterility. The Mother identified three men as possible fathers. McCarty *149could not be excluded as the biological father because the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kessler v. LoersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  3. C.K.A. v. M.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Klostermeier v. KlostermeierNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State ex rel. Brenden v. SusankaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API