Norris v. Poole
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant has presented a “motion to empower trial judge to hear and rule on appellant’s motion to reconsider denial of motion for new trial.” Appellee has filed opposition thereto.
The record reveals that on June 2, 1951 judgment was entered against appellant, who was "defendant below, for $800 for painting work, and that defendant filed a timely notice of appeal on June 12. The record on appeal has now been filed in this court, including approved statement of proceedings and evidence. This was filed on July 13.
The record also reveals that appellant (defendant below) filed in the trial court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Potts v. CattertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Wm. Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Chicago & W. I. R. v. Chicago & E. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Maltby v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Checker Cab Co. v. MarklandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944