Legal Opinion

Gunther v. H. W. Gossard Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 27, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks an order directing the trial by a jury of all the issues raised by the complaint, answer and reply.

Plaintiff pleads in her amended complaint five causes of action, all arising out of her contract of employment as a travel-ling saleswoman for defendant. Defendant answered on March 2nd, 1939, with a general denial, plus two special defenses as to two of plaintiff’s causes of action. The answer pleaded also two counterclaims, both growing out of plaintiff’s employment by defendant. To these counterclaims plaintiff served a reply on April 20, 1939, and…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pallant v. SinatraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  2. Spiro v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  3. McKnight v. Mutual Broadcasting System, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  5. Consolidated Fisheries Co. v. Fairbanks Morse & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API