Legal Opinion
Pallant v. Sinatra
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 19, 1945PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
The defendants, ten in number, move to strike plaintiff’s amended complaint on various grounds, which may be summarized as follows: (1) That the amended complaint was served without prior application to the Court'for permission to make service thereof and that at the time of its service plaintiff’s time to serve an amended complaint as of course under Rule 15(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, had expired; (2) that the copies of the amended complaint served on the attorneys for the various defendants- were not signed by an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Bellavance v. Plastic-Craft Novelty Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
- Beaunit Mills, Inc. v. Eday Fabric Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Atlantic Monthly Co. v. Post Pub. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928
- Williams v. CollierDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Goldlawr, Incorporated v. ShubertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Holley Coal Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Yaffe v. Detroit Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
- Smith v. Carter Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1952
- United Press Associations, a Corporation v. Sidney Dean Charles, Paul S. Charles and Patricia Charles and the Pioneer Printing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.