Pilgrim's Pride Corporation v. Gary Agerton
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (“PPG”), a igrgg producer of processed chicken, idled a number of its chicken pro cessing facilities with the alleged goal of reducing the excess chicken supply and increasing prices. Appellee chicken growers filed suit and obtained a money judgment against PPC for damages the district court found arose from PPC’s unlawful attempt to manipulate or control poultry prices. Because PPC’s unilateral decision to reduce production was neither illegitimate nor anti-competitive, we REVERSE and RENDER judgment in favor of PPC.
I
PPC, a Delaware corporation, is one…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- Adams v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2016
- Morris v. Tyson Chicken IncDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
- Peterson v. Agri Stats, Inc. DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN 20-cv-1319 JRT/HB .District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Peterson v. Agri Stats, Inc. DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN 20-cv-1319 JRT/HB .District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.