Legal Opinion

Leroy Haeger v. the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 16, 2016No. 12-17718, 13-16801, 13-16861, 13-16862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEROY HAEGER; DONNA HAEGER, No. 12-17718 husband and wife; BARRY HAEGER; SUZANNE HAEGER, husband and D.C. No. wife, 2:05-cv-02046- Plaintiffs-Appellees, ROS v. THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and SPARTAN MOTORS, INC., a Michigan corporation; GULFSTREAM COACH, INC., an Indiana corporation, Defendants, v. ROETZEL & ANDRESS, LPA; BASIL J. MUSNUFF, Movants. 2 HAEGER V. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. LEROY HAEGER; DONNA HAEGER, No. 13-16801 husband and wife; BARRY HAEGER; SUZANNE HAEGER,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. (PS) Alston v. LLoydDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. Leroy Haeger v. the Goodyear Tire & Rubber CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API