Legal Opinion

State v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNck, J.

The bill of indictment upon which the defendant was convicted and sentenced charged that he did unlawfully, fraudulently and feloniously obtain from the prosecuting witness, by falsely pretending that two certain mules were free and clear of all encumbrances, “the following goods and things of value, the property of Freeman Grady, to wit: Goods and things of value, evidenced by a note in the sum of $200, which note is credited with $50, with intent then and there to defraud, . . .”

Upon the arraignment and in apt time the defendant moved the court that the indictment be quashed upon the ground…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. State v. . ReeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  2. State v. LedwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. RicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. MostafaviCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API