Legal Opinion

Antonelli v. Pugh

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 1, 1963No. [No. 138, September Term, 1962.]Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

231 Md. 194 (1963)

189 A.2d 653

ANTONELLI ET AL.

v.

PUGH, ETC., ET AL.

[No. 138, September Term, 1962.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 1, 1963.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and MARBURY, JJ.

Joseph A. De Paul, with whom were Keane & DePaul and Edward C. Bell on the brief, for appellants.

Hal C.B. Clagett, with whom were Sasscer, Clagett & Powers, John D. Fitzgerald, and Fitzgerald & Taylor on the brief, for appellees.

2Opinion of the Court · HendersonHenderson, J.

These appeals arise out of a collision between two automobiles, one driven by Stewart J. Whitney, Sr., in which his twelve year old son,…

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Smith v. BernfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Brehm v. LorenzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  4. Ford v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Rickard v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API