State v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge. *
Appellant challenges his conviction of possession of a firearm by an ineligible person, arguing that (1) he was not subject to the firearm restriction because his felony burglary conviction was deemed to be a misdemeanor after he completed probation; (2) the district court erred in concluding that the search of his home under a condition of his probation not imposed by the sentencing court itself, was lawful; and (3) the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct in closing argument by injecting his personal opinion and vouching for the credibility of witnesses. We…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State of Minnesota v. Peter James TrumbleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016