Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 12, 2006No. A05-1167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge. *

Appellant challenges his conviction of possession of a firearm by an ineligible person, arguing that (1) he was not subject to the firearm restriction because his felony burglary conviction was deemed to be a misdemeanor after he completed probation; (2) the district court erred in concluding that the search of his home under a condition of his probation not imposed by the sentencing court itself, was lawful; and (3) the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct in closing argument by injecting his personal opinion and vouching for the credibility of witnesses. We…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. State v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. State of Minnesota v. Peter James TrumbleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API